Why so many customers choose Coulomb Sulfur Analyzer? A Practical Selection Guide between Coulomb and Infrared Sulfur Analyzer for Coal and Coke Laboratories
Every coal export laboratory, third-party inspection body and power-plant quality team eventually faces the same question: should total sulfur be determined by Coulomb titration or by high-temperature combustion with infrared (IR) detection?
Both techniques are mature, covered by international standards, and used successfully around the world. The right answer depends on your sample mix, throughput, reporting requirements and operating budget — not on which method is “newer”. This guide sets out how each technique works, where each one performs best, and which Sundy analyzer best matches the requirements of your laboratory.
1. How the two techniques differ
Both methods share the same first step: a weighed test portion is burned in a stream of oxygen at high temperature, converting the sulfur in the sample into gaseous sulfur dioxide (SO2). They differ in how that SO2 is quantified.
1.1 Coulomb titration
The combustion gases are absorbed in an electrolytic cell containing potassium iodide/potassium bromide electrolyte. The SO2 reacts with iodine generated electrochemically; the instrument measures the electric charge (current integrated over time) required to maintain the titration endpoint. By Faraday’s law, this charge is directly proportional to the mass of sulfur.
In practice this means the measurement is absolute and inherently linear across the working range: low-, medium- and high-sulfur samples are determined on the same setting, with the same sample weight and the same integration logic.

Sundy SDS720 Coulomb Sulfur Analyzer Schematic Diagram
1.2 Infrared detection
The combustion gases pass through a cell where SO2 absorbs infrared energy at a specific wavelength. The reduction in transmitted energy is proportional to the SO2 concentration, and sulfur is calculated from the sample weight and a calibration established with certified reference materials.
IR sulfur analyzers are fully automated: Auto loader(high level type IR sulfur analyzer), automatic crucible identification, automatic remind filter-wool replacement and low-drift cells have made them the workhorse of high-volume commercial laboratories, where sample throughput and unattended operation dominate the economics.

Sundy SDIS450 Infrared Sulfur Analyzer Schematic Diagram
2. The standards landscape
Coulomb and IR sulfur determination are separate, equally valid standardized methods. Which one a laboratory adopts often follows from its market: coal traded in Africa、Asia and Europe is frequently specified to ISO, while North American contracts more often call for ASTM procedures.
| Standard | Technique | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| ISO 20336:2025 — Coal and coke — Determination of total sulfur by Coulomb titration method (Edition 2, 2025) | Coulomb titration | International reference method for the Coulomb technique; specifies high-temperature combustion followed by Coulomb titration, including sample preparation, apparatus and repeatability requirements |
| ISO 19579:2006 — Solid mineral fuels — Determination of sulfur by IR spectrometry | Infrared detection | International reference method for the combustion/IR technique |
| ASTM D4239 — Standard Test Methods for Sulfur in the Analysis Sample of Coal and Coke Using High-Temperature Tube Furnace Combustion | Combustion with IR or alternative detection | US reference method; the IR-absorption finish is one of the procedures described |
| ASTM D5016 | Combustion with IR detection | Total sulfur in ash from coal and coke combustion |
| GB/T 214-2007 — Determination of total sulfur in coal | Combustion (Coulomb and IR), plus alternative methods | Chinese national standard; specifies Coulomb titration and infrared absorption as instrumental methods |
| ISO 334 (Eschka method) and ISO 351 (high-temperature combustion with acid-base titration) | Reference/umpire methods | Slower, more labor-intensive; still used for referee analysis and calibration checks |
Sundy’s Coulomb Sulfur Analyzers— SDS720 and SDS-V — are designed to conform to ISO 20336:2025 and GB/T 214-2007. Sundy’s Infrared Sulfur Analyzers — SDIS401, SDIS450 and SDICS450 — are designed to conform to ISO 19579, ASTM D4239, ASTM D5016 and GB/T 25214, so that a single laboratory can satisfy either contract specification or both.
3. Sample preparation and test procedure(Taking coulomb sulfur Analyzer as an example)
Whichever technique is used, sulfur results are only as good as the sample presented to the instrument. For the determination of total sulfur in coal or coke, the general analysis test sample is ground to pass a 212 µm sieve; for materials containing more than 5 % sulfur, a 100 µm grind is used. The sample is spread in a thin layer and allowed to reach approximate moisture equilibrium with the laboratory atmosphere, then thoroughly mixed before the determination.
Where results are to be reported on a basis other than air-dried, the moisture content of a further portion of the same test sample is determined in accordance with ISO 11722 (hard coal), ISO 687 (coke) or ISO 5068-2 (brown coal and lignite).
A typical automated Coulomb determination — shown here for the SDS720 — runs as follows:
1. Sample logging. Sample ID and weight are entered in the instrument software; the weight is transferred automatically, so no manual transcription is required.

2. Weighing and acceleration. A test portion of 0.05 g ± 0.005 g is weighed to the nearest 0.0001 g into a combustion boat and covered with a thin layer of tungsten trioxide (WO3) as a combustion accelerator. For samples containing more than 5 % sulfur, a test portion of 0.03 g ± 0.005 g is appropriate.
3. Combustion and titration. The boat is placed on the quartz tray and the run is started from the software. The software controls every subsequent step: automatic pushing of the tray into the combustion tube, the residence time at the preliminary decomposition zone (approx. 500 °C) and at the high-temperature zone (1150 ± 10 °C), and the Coulomb evaluation. Residence time at the preliminary decomposition zone is set according to the combustion behaviour and sulfur content of the sample, normally 60-180 s.

4. Data output. Results are available as a printed or electronic report and can be exported to a
4. Typical performance: repeatability on real coal samples
The table below summarizes a repeatability study on seven coal samples covering a total sulfur range of 0.24 % to 4.43 % (dry basis). Each sample was determined three times.
| Sample | Mass (mg) | Mad (%) | St, ad (%) | St, d (%) | Mean St, d (%) | Range (%) | Repeatability limit (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26h | 50.6 | 2.99 | 0.24 | 0.25 | 0.24 | 0.01 | 0.03 |
| 26h | 50.3 | 2.99 | 0.23 | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.01 | |
| 26h | 50.8 | 2.99 | 0.23 | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.01 | |
| 01a | 50.0 | 1.42 | 0.45 | 0.46 | 0.44 | 0.03 | 0.04 |
| 01a | 50.8 | 1.42 | 0.43 | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.03 | |
| 01a | 50.3 | 1.42 | 0.42 | 0.43 | 0.44 | 0.03 | |
| 07u | 50.4 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.02 | 0.05 |
| 07u | 50.4 | 0.90 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.02 | |
| 07u | 50.5 | 0.90 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.02 | |
| 02k | 50.3 | 2.92 | 1.40 | 1.44 | 1.45 | 0.02 | 0.08 |
| 02k | 50.7 | 2.92 | 1.40 | 1.44 | 1.45 | 0.02 | |
| 02k | 50.2 | 2.92 | 1.42 | 1.46 | 1.45 | 0.02 | |
| 12o | 50.3 | 2.21 | 2.06 | 2.11 | 2.11 | 0.01 | 0.10 |
| 12o | 50.4 | 2.21 | 2.06 | 2.11 | 2.11 | 0.01 | |
| 12o | 50.3 | 2.21 | 2.05 | 2.10 | 2.11 | 0.01 | |
| 13q | 50.1 | 4.22 | 2.77 | 2.89 | 2.91 | 0.03 | 0.14 |
| 13q | 51.0 | 4.22 | 2.80 | 2.92 | 2.91 | 0.03 | |
| 13q | 50.6 | 4.22 | 2.79 | 2.91 | 2.91 | 0.03 | |
| 10z | 50.3 | 1.80 | 4.41 | 4.49 | 4.43 | 0.11 | 0.20 |
| 10z | 50.2 | 1.80 | 4.35 | 4.43 | 4.43 | 0.11 | |
| 10z | 50.7 | 1.80 | 4.30 | 4.38 | 4.43 | 0.11 |
Every result fell within the repeatability limit specified in ISO 20336:2025, Clause 10.1. Across the full range — from 0.24 % to 4.43 % total sulfur — repeatability was maintained without changing the analytical setting: one setting, one sample weight, one integration logic. This is precisely the behaviour that makes the Coulomb technique attractive for coal export, international trade and third-party testing work.
5. Cost of ownership: what actually drives the numbers
| Cost factor | Coulomb (SDS720 / SDS-V) | Infrared (SDIS401 / SDIS450 / SDICS450) |
|---|---|---|
| Capital cost | Lower: no precision optical bench, no autoloader mechanics on the entry-level model | Higher: precision IR cell, automated sample handling and filtration |
| Consumables | Electrolyte (KI/KBr) and glacial acetic acid — inexpensive, but requires periodic preparation and replacement | No chemical electrolyte; requires replacement of Dehydrite desiccant and filter wool |
| Maintenance | Electrolytic cell, electrodes and drying tube — straightforward, moderate cost | IR cell and furnace consumables — fewer interventions, higher unit cost when a component is replaced |
| Utilities | Combustion furnace at 1150 °C; inlet air; max. power 3.5–4 kW | Combustion furnace at 1250–1350 °C; oxygen ≥ 99.5 % purity; max. power 4–4.5 kW |
| Time per determination | Approx. 200 s, including sample feeding and cell recovery | Under 2 min for sulfur; 110–210 s for simultaneous carbon and sulfur |
| Loading capacity | 21 samples per loading cycle (SDS720); single-sample manual loading (SDS-V) | 50 samples per loading cycle (SDIS450, SDICS450); single-sample manual loading (SDIS401) |
| Operator involvement | Software-driven, modest manual preparation of electrolyte; unattended operation available on SDS720 | Largely unattended: automatic crucible identification, filter-wool replacement and drift correction |
The dominant cost is rarely the reagent. In high-volume laboratories it is labor and turnaround time, which favor automation; in smaller or more specialized laboratories it is capital cost and simplicity, which favor the Coulomb approach.
6. Matching the technique to your laboratory
| Your situation | Recommended approach | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Limited budget, low to medium sample load (no more than 200 samples per month) | Coulomb — SDS720 (automatic) or SDS-V (single-sample) | Lowest entry cost per determination; absolute, charge-based quantification with no calibration drift |
| High throughput (more than 50 samples per day) or several shifts of samples awaiting results | Infrared — SDIS450 or SDICS450 | Under 2 min per determination with 50-sample loading; the instrument runs unattended and reporting keeps pace with sampling |
| Best repeatability with minimal operator influence | Infrared | Automation removes sample-to-sample weighing and feeding variability; drift correction is periodic rather than per-sample |
| Maximum traceability to a certified reference standard, without recalibration across the range | Coulometric | Hardware integration of the electrolysis current gives an objective result — no post-run correction factor is applied |
| Frequent high-sulfur samples (above 3 %) | Coulometric, or infrared with high-sulfur calibration standards | Coulomb quantification is linear across the whole working range; IR requires calibration and range selection appropriate to the sulfur level |
| Many different sample types (coal, coke, oil, cement, rubber, soil, biomass) | Infrared — SDIS401 or SDIS450 | Wide application range and fast switching between matrices |
| Total sulfur plus carbon from the same test portion | Infrared — SDICS450 | Simultaneous carbon and sulfur determination in a single run |
7. Sundy’s sulfur analyzer portfolio
Sundy manufactures both technology lines, so the recommendation you receive from us is based on your laboratory profile rather than on a single available product.
| Model | Principle | Range and resolution | Capacity and analysis time | Standards and features |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SDS720 | Coulomb titration | Sulfur (0.01–40) %; resolution 0.001 %; precision RSD ≤ 2 % | 21 samples per loading, continuous loading; approx. 200 s per determination | ISO 20336:2025, GB/T 214-2007, JJG 1006 (Chinese metrological verification regulation); hardware charge integration by dedicated microcontroller; dual-rod sample feeding; widened and thickened electrode plates; leak-resistant cell design; low-maintenance air pump; furnace temperature 1150 ± 5 °C (coal and coke), 900 ± 5 °C (oil and pyrite), 1150–1200 °C (cement) |
| SDS-V | Coulomb titration | Sulfur (0.01–40) %; resolution 0.001 % | Single-sample manual loading; approx. 200 s per determination | ISO 20336:2025, GB/T 214-2007, JJG 1006; hardware integration with no second calibration; one-touch gas-tightness check; optimized cell positioning and wide electrode plates; compact bench footprint |
| SDIS401 | Infrared absorption | Sulfur (0.01–50) %, extendable to 100 %; resolution 0.001 % | Single-sample manual loading; under 2 min per determination | ISO 19579, ASTM D4239, ASTM D5016, GB/T 25214; combustion tube with secondary combustion zone; ultra-low-drift IR cell requiring one drift correction per working day; can be combined with the SDCHN636 CHN analyzer for carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen and sulfur |
| SDIS450 | Infrared absorption | Sulfur (0.01–50) %, extendable to 100 %; resolution 0.001 % | 50 samples per loading, automatic feeding and discarding; under 2 min per determination | ISO 19579, ASTM D4239, ASTM D5016, GB/T 25214, AS 1038.6.3.3, BS 1016; patented combustion gas curtain; automatic filter-wool replacement; automatic crucible identification; software-based leak test; one PC can control several analyzers |
| SDICS450 | Infrared absorption (carbon and sulfur) | Sulfur (0.01–50) %, extendable to 100 %; carbon (0.1–100) %; resolution 0.001 % | 50 samples per loading; 110–210 s per determination | ISO 19579, ASTM D4239, ASTM D5016, ASTM D5373, GB/T 25214, GB/T 30733; simultaneous carbon and sulfur in one test portion; automatic furnace door; smooth-filter range setting for a wide detector span |
8. Selected reference installations
Coulomb sulfur analyzers from Sundy are in routine service with commercial laboratories, inspection bodies, power generators, cement producers and metallurgical plants across Asia and Africa, including:
| No. | Country | End User | Model | Serial No. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | South Africa | SGS | SDS720 | 021023-0037 |
| 2 | South Africa | SGS | SDS-V | 020326-0436 |
| 3 | South Africa | Cotecna | SDS-V | 020319-0034 |
| 4 | Turkey | Revolux Energy | SDS-V | 020326-0591 |
| 5 | Vietnam | Anindya | SDS720 | 021020-0092 |
| 6 | Thailand | CCIC | SDS-V | 020321-0087 |
| 7 | Indonesia | Huadian Boya | SDS720 | 021026-0261 |
| 8 | Indonesia | Lygend HPAL | SDS720 | 021025-0544 |
| 9 | Bangladesh | Barisal Power Plant | SDS720 | 021021-0107 |
| 10 | Pakistan | Bestway Cement | SDS720 | 021025-1072 |
| 11 | Pakistan | Fauji Cement | SDS720 | 021023-0182 |
| 12 | Pakistan | SGS | SDS-V | 020325-0943 |
| 13 | Mongolia | MAK | SDS720 | 021019-0211 |
| 14 | Mongolia | BAYALAG ENERGY | SDS720 | 021018-0150 |
| 15 | Laos | Sun Paper Shawan | SDS720 | 021021-0073 |
9. Summary: no “better” method — only a better fit
Coulomb titration (SDS720, SDS-V) delivers absolute, charge-based quantification in a compact and economical package. Because the result rests on Faraday’s law rather than on a calibration curve, it is the natural choice for coal and coke routine testing, for low- and mid-sulfur work, and for laboratories that value traceability without recalibration.
Infrared detection (SDIS401, SDIS450, SDICS450) delivers automation and speed: under two minutes per determination, 50-sample loading, unattended operation and a broad application range. It is the natural choice for high-volume commercial, inspection and multi-matrix laboratories.
Because Sundy builds both lines, we can compare them against your sample mix, throughput and reporting requirements — and support whichever instrument you choose with installation, training, calibration materials and spare parts.
To discuss which sulfur analyzer best fits your laboratory — and to arrange a demonstration — please contact us by phone or email.
Phone: +86-731-88112150
Email: sales@sundytech.com